I'm delighted to welcome back Aleksandr Voinov for the second part of my interview with him. The first part was on Tuesday and if you missed it then it's here. The first part concentrated on Aleks as an author and what inspires him to write, today the focus is on some of the books he has written. It's always great to read about the inspiration and reasons behind the books we love and here Aleks has done that for us. On with the interview!
What was the inspiration behind the character of Kendras in Scorpion?
Good question! I’m not entirely sure where Kendras came from – I was on holiday in Turkey (sweltering heat and basically spending the first days clinging to the aircon just to breathe), and suddenly I got this “voice” in my head. A messed up soldier with a broken foot after a lost battle. Marvellous. I was intrigued and spent most of that holiday typing frantically what I was seeing in my head. I didn’t even want the book – I went to Turkey with an idea to sit near the pool and finish my WWII novel, but Kendras had different ideas.
I think several little inspirations came together: the landscape and climate (and food) in Turkey, a chat I had with a friend on Dubrovnik, Glen Cook’s “Black Company” (which I read ages ago), and a scene where a king is being married to the sea – a death/rebirth ritual with orgy conducted by an utterly corrupt, power-mad priesthood (this bit might have turned into its own story – I didn’t yet know it belonged to the Kendras story, but it fell very nicely into place).
What was important about Kendras (and his officer) was that they weren’t white. I witnessed the “race fail” debate, during which I was accused of being a racist because my characters are usually white. So I’d grappled for a months with how a white writer with extremely limited experience of black people can write about black people. What issues can you write about? How to avoid the fetishization that’s always a danger? (You really don’t want to write about “chocolate cocks” for example – it is pretty offensive). Is the character’s world ethnically diverse? How do non-black people respond to black people? Is there such a thing as racism? I’d wrestled with these issues for a while, and then realized that Kendras was black (I didn’t “design” him black, it was something I discovered). Yet, that is not all he is, he’s many other things that are more important to him than his skin colour. Kendras’s ethnicity will play a bigger role in the next book, but it’s not his defining characteristic. He just happened to be black and I happened to come across that. (Don’t you love it when characters suddenly turn into something/body else?)

How much planning did a book like Scorpion take and what was your basis for the political, religious and social structures that you have created in that book?
No planning. I wrote the first 40% of that book in one go, in about five days, with alternating viewpoints of both Steel and Kendras. Then I hit a wall (right where Kendras decides to not stay with Steel but go out and find his comrades). My very nebulous idea that Kendras and Steel would end up together evaporated, because clearly, Kendras didn’t trust Steel enough and I just didn’t see them really fall in love, and I couldn’t force them. That was the moment the book almost died. Feeling like a hack and a loser, I pushed it away for a couple months, during which I started my new job that attempted to kill me with stress (I’m never, ever, returning to journalism), but after I talked to some friends and worked things out, I realized I just had to trust Kendras to do what he wanted.
I eliminated Steel’s point-of-view entirely (about 8-9k), rewrote everything into Kendras’s viewpoint, and let him do his thing. He then did what he had to do, and I just wrote what I saw. The twists in the book (the big revelation about the officer, for example) weren’t planned. The stuff just happened, it all came together. It was like watching a movie. I loved it.
There are two structures – one is political, the other religious, and of course they are all tangled. Dalman, while the old imperial city of a bygone era, is effectively controlled via corrupt high priest’s puppet king. The old “military outpost”, Fetin, is the rival power – basically a military autocracy. Vededrinye is run by the Elder – who’s both the spiritual and the worldly leader of his people. As a historian, I’d say Venice under the Doges, the Vatican as a priest-state, and possibly Sparta are inspirations, albeit seen through my (very) twisted imagination.
In Counterpunch you have taken the AU world created by Rachel Haimowitz and adapted it for your story. How easy was it to work from someone else’s ideas? Was it better or worse than starting from scratch with your own ideas?
When I read Rachel’s “
Anchored: Belonging”, my biggest gripe was that the slave, Daniel, is extremely limited in how much he can resist the system keeping him enslaved. The system itself fascinated me (I’ve done some studies on slavery at university, and that Ancient History degree definitely raised its head again here). I wanted to look at a slave who’d fight the system all the way and would be defiant with every breath.
I asked Rachel if I could run with a slave boxer, and she said I could. So, while her story is set in a version on the US, I went with Britain and Europe, which meant I could develop my own stuff, as long as it fitted into the greater concept. We discussed things like the role and attitude of slaves and Companions, manumission (setting a slave free) and other legal concepts, but I could very much do my own thing, so, apart from some chats and coordination to make sure our concepts didn’t clash, I didn’t find it any different to writing from scratch.
You seem to have a fondness for Soviet characters or at least those with a leaning towards Communism. Why is that?
I’m a child of the Cold War (born in 1975). As a teenager, I was completely convinced that I wouldn’t grow into an adult, as both the US and the USSR would turn Europe into a nuclear wasteland. As a Western German, we were brought up to think the US was the bee’s knees, but I couldn’t help being fascinated by the other side – the Soviets. I tried to understand what was going on. You know, the whole Sting “The Russians love their children, too” thing. It’s never left. It caused me to read widely on Russian history and culture, but I failed at learning the language (I can read the alphabet, which came in handy when I went to Moscow last year) and I have a huge respect to all “real life” Russians I’ve met and talked to.
I slowly realized the terrible damage they’ve all sustained under the totalitarian system/s. That alone would fill several books and I could go on and on about it, but totalitarianism is the bane of humanity, whether you call it Stalism, Nazism, Fascism doesn’t even matter. And again the German background plays a role – half my family vanished behind the Iron Curtain in Eastern Germany and was subjected to Socialist totalitarianism. Those scars are still there. I’m just trying to understand, so I put these things out into characters and see what they do. Mikhail Volkov, Vadim Krasnorada, Nikita Kazakov – they all have their issues and biographical wounds. I also, strangely, find the Russian “mentality” easier to write about than many others.
What interests you about the dynamics of dominance and submission and why does this feature in many of your books?
I’ve talked to BDSM lifestylers about that, and apparently what I do is not always BDSM, but when it called “power exchange”. It’s fascinating when people negotiate power. When there are no roles that people just assume for the sake of the author or the good old alpha/omega dynamic that many seem to fall back on. My guys are just guys, and they have varying levels of sexual/erotic flexibility, but all of them are aware of power, power dynamics and issues like control and trust and status (I might have hung around bankers for too long!). When you meet somebody, you don’t know how they work, and there’s that delicious dance of getting to know each other – what the other person likes and what are hot buttons. That negotiation, that insecurity, that lure and danger of the unknown fascinates me endlessly.
Transit is a very different book to your others in that it’s a straightforward and quite sweet contemporary romance. How did this book come about?
We started work on this when the call came out for I Do, Too (a charity anthology about love and marriage). I really wanted to donate a story for this very worthy cause. But Andrew and Javier just kept going, and we wrote twice the amount of words that were allowed for the anthology.
Transit was definitely a case when you hope that that bone belongs to a small animal, but it didn’t. While we worked on that story, the global economy was going to hell, and I’d talked about a friend who works in advertising and what was going on in the industry at that point in time. I wanted to write about all that, but with an uplifting angle.
It’s a very Christmassy story, too, and Christmas has always been a time of reflection for me. “Am I where I want to be? And how the hell did I end up doing this?” My character, Andrew, thought he was really slick and doing well, while the corporate politics were slowly strangling his enthusiasm and joy. I admire people greatly who are capable of stopping in the middle of all that stress and horror of a bad job and ask (and answer) the hard questions. Where do I want to go? Is this the best/healthiest/sanest I can be? What needs changing? What about my soul/heart/emotions?
I did enjoy writing it, but it sits oddly next to the others, I admit.
I’ve loved all your historical novels. How does writing an historical compare to a contemporary or fantasy/sci-fi? Do you have plans for more historical?
Thanks! Historicals are about a hundred times more work than anything else, probably because I’m completely neurotic about accuracy, like my history professors are watching while I type. It’s that bad. In fantasy, you can take history, twist the bits you like and ignore the stuff you know nothing about (hence
Scorpion feels “pseudo-historical” – clearly, there’s a lot of my history background in there, but it’s only adhering to its own internal logic). It still needs to be well-written and make sense, but you can hand-wave issues like “were there atheists in the Middle Ages?” and just posit that Kendras is so cynical he is basically an atheist in a world where a lot of people are not.

If I write about a Templar like William Raven from
Deliverance, I’m looking at his weapons, his ideology, his personal take on it, his background as a noble from a specific area in Europe, and his overall mentality and attitude (also about sex, gay sex, “being gay”). If you take
Deliverance – there’s a training combat scene of maybe 500 words that took 3-4 days of research. The boar hunt in
Lion of Kent is the result of ten days of research - we’re talking maybe 2-3k words here. But it is as accurate as I could make it without acquiring an MA in Medieval Hunting or going on an actual boar hunt myself (I had the funds and the times to do things like that, I totally would, though).
And, yes, I’m getting less neurotic about historicals (less fear, more confidence). Kate Cotoner and I have started work on
Lion’s Share, the next part in William Raven’s story, so that’s medieval.
Then I’m joking that in 2012, I will be living in the Second World War. I have three, maybe four stories set in WWII, and two of them are definitely novels. I know the shapes of those two – the rest might be novels or novellas or might not happen at all. It’s way too early to say anything about them.
I’m going to devote the whole year to those two novels. I’m not rushing it, if I need to read tens of thousands of pages of research to get them exactly right, that’s what I’m going to do. I couldn’t forgive myself if I got those wrong. Once you’re writing historicals about what’s still inside “living memory”, the stakes go up tremendously. WWII created the modern world as we know it, too many people died – I just can’t take this lightly. I’m still grappling with the whole event, what it did, what it meant, but I feel there are untold stories and they’ve come to me to be told.
You are very active over the internet with your own blog, Twitter, Facebook, Good Reads and commenting on other blogs. How important is it for authors such as yourself to keep up an internet presence?
Apart from as a procrastination tool? (Laughs) I guess most of my friends and “close contacts” are “virtual people on the internet”. That’s my tribe, that’s where I feel comfortable and where I go to unwind after a rough day at the day job. I just hang out and enjoy myself. I like discussing what we’re doing and networking with other writers, readers and other fans of the genre, bloggers and reviewers. I’m all that too; writer, reader, blogger and reviewer. It’s a great way to stay abreast of news and trends, what people complain about and what they like. Some discussion topics (like “race fail” or “violence in romance”) caused me to look at my own writing and my own attitudes, sharpening my understanding of what it is what I do and how other people see it. Sometimes I might even have a clever idea to contribute. It’s one gigantic conversation, and I’m too interested to hear people’s opinions to shut up and sit back.
But, yes, if you’re an indie author in our space, you have to have a website and/or blog at least. Readers that loved your book will check out your website/blog, to learn about other books, maybe even the brain behind it all.
You have a new book coming out...tell us about it.
There are several (I’ve had an incredibly busy 2011):
The Dark Soul series from Riptide, and
Break and Enter from Samhain in December, but let’s go with the novel out just right now:
Counterpunch. Slave boxers (the fighter, not the garment). The blurb does a great job of summing it up:
Fight like a man, or die like a slave.
Brooklyn Marshall used to be a policeman in London, with a wife and a promising future ahead of him. Then he accidentally killed a rioter whose father was a Member of Parliament and had him convicted of murder. To ease the burden on the overcrowded prison system, Brooklyn was sold into slavery rather than incarcerated. Now, he's the "Mean Machine", a boxer on the slave prizefighting circuit, pummelling other slaves for the entertainment of freemen and being rented out for the sexual service of his wealthier fans.
When Nathaniel Bishop purchases Brooklyn's services for a night, it seems like any other assignation. But the pair form an unexpected bond that grows into something more. Brooklyn hesitates to call it "love"—such things do not exist between freemen and slaves—but when Nathaniel reveals that he wants to help get Brooklyn's conviction overturned, he dares to hope. Then, an accident in the ring sends Brooklyn on the run, jeopardizing everything he has worked so hard to achieve and sending him into the most important fight of all—the fight for freedom.
As all of my books, it has men fighting for what’s important to them, power exchange, hot sex, intrigue, politics, and men with big issues that eventually work things out. It’s pretty intense and I’m really proud how it has turned out. In terms of my novels, it’s the best I’ve done so far on my own, with
Scorpion a close second.
What’s next for you?
I’m going to slow the hell down. (Laughs) 2011 has been such a ride that I honestly need a breather. I want to finish Lion’s Share in 2011, but for 2012, my only goal is to relax and write my WWII novels. From a reader’s perspective, 2012 will be really quiet. I might do some shorts – they might just happen in between as I stumble over some dinosaur bones – but that year is filled up with the historical novels, and they are the Big Priorities. Yep, that’s it.
Thank you for the interview!
Thank you very much for hosting me on your blog!
You can find Aleks on his
website or at
his blog or on
Good Reads or on Twitter as @vashtan.
Many, many thanks to Aleks for these comprehensive and very enlightening answers. Don't forget that if you leave a comment on either (or both) of today or Tuesday's posts then you can be in the running for a copy of Scorpion, of Counterpunch and one choice from Aleks' backlist. Good luck!